Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 23;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-11-6

Table 1.

Genetic diversity of each population.

Location N HE HO FIS Â20 ± SD UAN
OV 21 0.489 0.498 0.009 4.76±0.089 1
RE 29 0.587 0.401 0.336b 6.28±0.303 3
LG 48 0.420 0.342 0.197b 5.12±0.335 1
VN 94 0.583 0.509 0.132b 4.52±0.415 1
RL 48 0.571 0.377 0.349b 5.04±0.358 2
ML 48 0.486 0.388 0.213b 3.44±0.434 0
MG 96 0.457 0.437 0.050 4.20±0.200 2
TJ 96 0.381 0.346 0.096a 4.16±0.297 1
RM 48 0.580 0.318 0.460b 4.48±0.303 0
RF 48 0.410 0.380 0.083 3.44±0.219 0
TV 48 0.433 0.361 0.177b 3.44±0.434 1
LX 44 0.323 0.218 0.335b 3.08±0.228 0

a <0.05 and b <0.001 using 10,000 permutations. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1 and are ordered from north to south, bold letters are extinct populations; N, sample sizes; HO and HE, observed and expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient with significant values. Â20, mean allelic richness normalized to the smallest sample size; SD, standard deviation of Â20; UAN, unique allelic number.