Table 1.
Location | N | HE | HO | FIS | Â20 ± SD | UAN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OV | 21 | 0.489 | 0.498 | 0.009 | 4.76±0.089 | 1 |
RE | 29 | 0.587 | 0.401 | 0.336b | 6.28±0.303 | 3 |
LG | 48 | 0.420 | 0.342 | 0.197b | 5.12±0.335 | 1 |
VN | 94 | 0.583 | 0.509 | 0.132b | 4.52±0.415 | 1 |
RL | 48 | 0.571 | 0.377 | 0.349b | 5.04±0.358 | 2 |
ML | 48 | 0.486 | 0.388 | 0.213b | 3.44±0.434 | 0 |
MG | 96 | 0.457 | 0.437 | 0.050 | 4.20±0.200 | 2 |
TJ | 96 | 0.381 | 0.346 | 0.096a | 4.16±0.297 | 1 |
RM | 48 | 0.580 | 0.318 | 0.460b | 4.48±0.303 | 0 |
RF | 48 | 0.410 | 0.380 | 0.083 | 3.44±0.219 | 0 |
TV | 48 | 0.433 | 0.361 | 0.177b | 3.44±0.434 | 1 |
LX | 44 | 0.323 | 0.218 | 0.335b | 3.08±0.228 | 0 |
a <0.05 and b <0.001 using 10,000 permutations. Codes correspond to locations in Figure 1 and are ordered from north to south, bold letters are extinct populations; N, sample sizes; HO and HE, observed and expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient with significant values. Â20, mean allelic richness normalized to the smallest sample size; SD, standard deviation of Â20; UAN, unique allelic number.