Table 3. Summary of standard population genetics analyses for each sample.
MO1 (n = 31) | MO2 (n = 23) | NE1 (n = 16) | NE2 (n = 15) | US10 (n = 13) | ||||||||||||||||||
Locus | Na (total) | He (total) | Na | Ho | He | Fis | Na | Ho | He | Fis | Na | Ho | He | Fis | Na | Ho | He | Fis | Na | Ho | He | Fis |
PWN_3 | 3 | 0.309 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 2 | 0.692 | 0.471 | −0.500 |
PWN_6 | 3 | 0.291 | 2 | 0.194 | 0.178 | −0.091 | 2 | 0.044 | 0.044 | 0 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
PWN_26 | 3 | 0.306 | 2 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
PWN_30 | 2 | 0.283 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
PWN_34 | 5 | 0.305 | 2 | 0.065 | 0.064 | −0.017 | 4 | 0.174 | 0.205 | 0.154 | 2 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 2 | 0.077 | 0.323 | 0.769 |
PWN_35 | 5 | 0.735 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.668 | 0.256 | 3 | 0.462 | 0.655 | 0.304 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 2 | 0.154 | 0.148 | −0.044 |
PWN_49 | 2 | 0.253 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
PWN_51¤ | 6 | 0.730 | 5 | 0.484 | 0.649 | 0,258* | 6 | 0.636 | 0.771 | 0.178 | 2 | 0.563 | 0.417 | −0.364 | 3 | 0.400 | 0.690 | 0,429* | 2 | 0.154 | 0.148 | −0.044 |
PWN_54 | 7 | 0.639 | 4 | 0.552 | 0.571 | 0.035 | 6 | 0.476 | 0.617 | 0.232 | 4 | 0.286 | 0.325 | 0.126 | 2 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0 | 2 | 0.692 | 0.508 | −0.385 |
PWN_56 | 4 | 0.659 | 4 | 0.400 | 0.432 | 0.076 | 4 | 0.364 | 0.648 | 0.445 | 3 | 0.313 | 0.280 | −0.119 | 2 | 0.308 | 0.443 | 0.314 | 2 | 0.231 | 0.212 | −0.091 |
PWN_60 | 11 | 0.825 | 8 | 0.467 | 0.746 | 0,378* | 6 | 0.381 | 0.612 | 0,384* | 2 | 0.133 | 0.129 | −0.037 | 3 | 0.643 | 0.680 | 0.057 | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
PWN_62 | 9 | 0.644 | 7 | 0.484 | 0.672 | 0.283 | 7 | 0.381 | 0.702 | 0,463* | 4 | 0.500 | 0.730 | 0.322 | 3 | 0.214 | 0.519 | 0,596* | 2 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0.000 |
PWN_79 | 6 | 0.822 | 5 | 0.733 | 0.777 | 0,057* | 5 | 0.619 | 0.741 | 0.168 | 3 | 0.467 | 0.522 | 0.109 | 4 | 0.571 | 0.632 | 0.010 | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
PWN_80 | 2 | 0.142 | 2 | 0.065 | 0.064 | −0.017 | 2 | 0.174 | 0.162 | −0.073 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.121 | −0.035 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 2 | 0.539 | 0.409 | −0.333 |
PWN_84 | 4 | 0.266 | 2 | 0.032 | 0.094 | 0.659 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 2 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0 | 1 | _ | _ | _ | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
Bx07¤ | 6 | 0.729 | 5 | 0.484 | 0.649 | 0.258 | 6 | 0.600 | 0.774 | 0.230 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.387 | −0.304 | 3 | 0.250 | 0.692 | 0,649* | 2 | 0.154 | 0.148 | −0.044 |
Bx08 | 5 | 0.593 | 3 | 0.323 | 0.349 | 0.076 | 4 | 0.524 | 0.614 | 0.151 | 2 | 0.385 | 0.508 | 0.250 | 3 | 0.333 | 0.297 | −0.129 | 1 | _ | _ | _ |
All loci | 4.9 | 0.482 | 3.4 | 0.284 | 0.350 | 0,192* | 3.5 | 0.284 | 0.385 | 0,264* | 2.0 | 0.199 | 0.209 | 0.036 | 1.9 | 0.165 | 0.237 | 0,306* | 1.1 | 0.163 | 0.144 | −0.140 |
Note: Na (total), Na, Ho and He refer to as the total number of alleles per locus over all samples, the number of alleles per locus in each sample, the observed heterozygosity and the expected heterozygosity, respectively. Fis was calculated after Weir & Cockerham [41]. The last row gives mean numbers of alleles, mean heterozygosities and Fis calculated over all loci. ‘*’ indicates that the HWE test is significant after FDR correction [39] (except for the last row). ‘¤’ indicates the microsatellite markers involved in significant linkage disequilibria after sequential Bonferroni adjustment [40]. ‘_’ means that for monomorphic markers, Ho, He and Fis were not computed.