Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 3;28(4):496–503. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2237-8

Table 2.

Absolute Performance on Quality Measures, by Measure and by Type of Medical Record (N = 466 Physicians, Requiring at Least 30 Patients for at Least One Measure Per Physician)

Quality measure Hudson Valley National benchmark
Performance*
N† Overall Paper EHR p-value‡
Diabetes—eye visit 86 34.1 % 35.1 % 32.7 % 0.28 56.5 %
Diabetes—HgbA1c testing 86 86.7 % 84.2 % 90.1 % < 0.01 89.0 %
Diabetes—LDL testing 86 86.2 % 85.1 % 87.6 % 0.26 84.8 %
Diabetes—nephropathy screening 86 66.3 % 64.8 % 68.2 % 0.33 82.4 %
Breast cancer screening 358 76.1 % 74.2 % 78.6 % < 0.001 70.2 %
Chlamydia screening 27 59.7 % 53.0 % 65.8 % 0.02 41.7 %
Colorectal cancer screening 391 49.4 % 48.0 % 51.3 % 0.01 58.6 %
Appropriate testing for children with pharyngitis 28 65.9 % 74.2 % 52.9 % 0.05 75.6 %
Appropriate treatment for children with upper respiratory infection 55 91.5 % 93.0 % 90.0 % 0.19 83.9 %

EHR electronic health record. Hgb A1c hemoglobin A1c. LDL low-density lipoprotein

* Performance is first calculated as the proportion of a provider’s patients who received the recommended intervention and then averaged across the providers in the stated group

† Of the 466 physicians, 315 contributed data for only breast cancer and colorectal cancer screening

p-values were calculated with t-tests comparing the paper and EHR groups