Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 9;13:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-87

Table 4.

Geographic differences in payment and coping mechanisms

Variables Rural Peri-urban Urban p-value R:U ratio
Out-of-Pocket but reimbursed
6(43)
1(7)
7(50)
0.051
0.86
Out-of-Pocket without reimbursement
369(36)
382(37)
284(27)
0.24
1.3
Health Insurance
2(50)
1(25)
1(25)
0.82
2
Instalment
36(34)
45(43)
24(23)
0.28
1.5
In-kind
1(17)
1(17)
4(66)
0.11
0.25
Others
8(24)
7(21)
18(55)
0.003
0.44
Payment coping mechanisms by geographic location (%)
Own money
385(36)
395(37)
286(27)
0.004
1.35
Borrowed money
8(26)
7(23)
16(51)
0.01
0.5
Sold moveable assets
0
0
1(100)
0.28
0
Sold family land
0
0
0
N/A
0
Payment subsidised
13(46)
1(4)
14(50)
0.001
0.93
Payment deferred
7(78)
1(11)
1(11)
0.03
7
Community solidarity/someone else paid
2(11)
12(63)
5(26)
0.03
0.4
Exempted
3(37)
1(13)
4(50)
0.26
0.75
Others 3(21) 3(21) 8(58) 0.03 0.38