Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 9;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-27

Table 7.

Association of explanatory variables with the composite quality score (N = 3,700 individuals within 240 general practices within 9 countries)

  Estimate [95% CI] P value
Individual level
 
 
 
   Age (per 5-year)
−0.52
[−1.42; 0.38]
0.2567
   Gender: female
−0.99
[−2.31; 0.35]
0.1488
Practice level
 
 
 
   FTE GP ≥ 21
1.60
[−2.12; 5.33]
0.3983
   Practice location: urban2
0.13
[−3.36; 3.62]
0.9421
   Practice score ‘PrevServ_53 4.28 [2.59; 5.97] <0.0001

1 FTE = Full time equivalent.

2 Urban: Practice location in town > 100,000 inhabitants (> 30,000 in Slovenia).

3 PrevServ_5 = Score of the number of ‘yes answers’ from the following items (Table 3):

Item 2: Is CVD risk advice (e.g. about modifiable risk factors such as diet and exercise) integrated with the patient medical record system?

Item 7: Does the practice use case finding methods to detect patients with cardiovascular risk factors?

Item 10: Does the practice have an up-to-date directory of prevention activities/organizations available locally (e.g. gyms, walking groups, weight-watchers etc.)?

Item 11: Did all nurses attend ≥ one training/continuing medical education event on CVD within the last 5 years?

Item 13: Does the practice have a procedure for smoking cessation (e.g. Minimal Intervention Strategy)?