Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 14;12:6. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-6

Table 7.

Logistic regression main effects and interactions of neighborhood poverty and primary payer on receipt of initial and adjuvant therapies among women with node negative breast cancer

 
Radiation therapya
Chemotherapy
Hormone therapyb
Predictor variables Sample OR (95% CI) Sample OR (95% CI) Sample OR (95% CI)
 
Single predictor models
Neighborhood poverty
  < 5% poor
877 
1.00
 
1,327 
1.00
 
932 
1.00
 
  5-29% poor
762 
0.80*
(0.63, 1.01)
1,232 
1.18
(0.94, 1.46)
756 
0.77
(0.63, 0.93)
  ≥ 30% poor
611 
0.63
(0.49, 0.81)
1,113 
0.96
(0.76, 1.22)
611 
0.70
(0.56, 0.86)
Primary payer
  All others
980 
1.00
 
1,627 
1.00
 
1,002 
1.00
 
  Private
1,270 
1.40
(1.12, 1.75)
2,045 
1.00
(0.81, 1.24)
1,297 
1.38
(1.14, 1.66)
 
Full models
Neighborhood poverty
  < 5% poor
877 
1.00
 
1,327 
1.00
 
932 
1.00
 
  5-29% poor
762 
0.62
(0.44, 0.87)
1,232 
1.16
(0.93, 1.44)
756 
0.78
(0.64, 0.95)
  ≥ 30% poor
611 
0.51
(0.37, 0.72)
1,113 
0.77
(0.54, 1.10)
611 
0.73
(0.59, 0.90)
Primary payer
  All others
980 
1.00
 
1,627 
1.00
 
1,002 
1.00
 
  Private
1,270 
0.97
(0.68, 1.40)
2,045 
0.87
(0.66, 1.13)
1,297 
1.32
(1.09, 1.60)
Poverty by payer
2,250
1.61
(1.05, 2.46)
3,672
1.43*
(0.93, 2.19)
2,299
0.98c
(0.79, 1.21)
 
Poverty by payer interaction on receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy
 
 
> 5% poor
< 5% poor
 
 
 
 
Sample
OR
(95% CI)
Sample
OR
(95% CI)
 
 
Primary payer
  All others
 
651 
1.00
 
329 
1.00
 
 
 
  Private
 
722 
1.56
(1.19, 2.03)
548 
1.06
(0.70, 1.61)
 
 
 
Poverty by payer interaction on receipt of chemotherapy
 
 
> 30% poor
< 30% poor
 
 
 
 
Sample
OR
(95% CI)
Sample
OR
(95% CI)
 
 
Primary payer
  All others
 
639 
1.00
 
988 
1.00
 
 
 
  Private   474  1.39* (0.94, 2.06) 1,571  0.86 (0.65, 1.13)    

Notes. OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval. All effects were age and tumor size-adjusted across these categories: 25–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74 and 75 or older; and less than 10, 10–19 and 20–50 mm or larger. Bolded ORs were statistically significant at p < .05.

a Among women who received breast conserving surgery. b Among women with hormone receptor positive tumors.

c Null interaction was removed from the full model. *p < .10.