Table 4.
Means statements, oral versus LAI |
All |
The Netherlands |
Belgium |
Germany |
Italy |
UK |
France |
Nordic countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N = 891 | n = 109 | n = 97 | n = 182 | n = 187 | n = 83 | n = 132 | n = 101 | |
1. If a patient is on a LAI antipsychotic and did not appear at the administration appointment as prescribed I can act upon it |
5.4 |
5.6 |
5.1 |
5.6 |
5.8 |
5.6 |
4.6 |
5.7 |
2. If a patient is on oral antipsychotics, it is impossible to ascertain whether the patient has been taking an antipsychotic or not |
4.3 |
4.4 |
4.9 |
3.3 |
4.7 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
3. Because of adherence advantages of LAIs, a lower rate of relapse can be ensured |
5.5 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
4. The best way of managing non-adherence with antipsychotics (due to poor insight) is with LAIs |
5.2 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
5. Administration of a LAI antipsychotic in the deltoid muscle as opposed to the buttocks is a respectful way of administering antipsychotics |
4.6 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
5.2 |
4.7 |
5.0 |
6. The ability to administer a LAI antipsychotic in the deltoid muscle instead of the gluteal muscle will lead to an increase in the use of LAI antipsychotic medication |
4.2 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
4.7 |
7. Current oral antipsychotics can get many patients well, but LAI atypical antipsychotics will keep the patients well | 4.6 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Respondents (Base: total n = 891) were asked to indicate, on a scale ranging from one to seven, whether they agreed or disagreed (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree) with statements comparing long-acting medication with oral medication (question numbers 1–4 and 7) and statements comparing deltoid administration with oral administration (question numbers 5 and 6).