Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 12;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-96

Table 2.

Overall mismatch rates in overlapping paired-end reads for raw read pairs, read pairs that have quality scores Q10, Q≥20, Q≥30 and Q≥35

Sample Raw Q10 (1×10-1) Q20 (1×10-2) Q30 (1×10-3) Q35 (3×10-4)
BCV control
5.55×10-3
7.82×10-4
9.56×10-5
1.94×10-6
4.26×10-8
Rabies control
7.33×10-3
9.64×10-4
1.12×10-4
2.59×10-6
1.31×10-7
BCV
4.91×10-3
7.87×10-4
1.06×10-4
2.55×10-6
1.51×10-7
Fox1
8.92×10-3
1.01×10-3
1.73×10-4
8.82×10-6
6.92×10-7
Fox2
6.69×10-3
8.33×10-4
1.22×10-4
4.16×10-6
2.28×10-7
Average of 5 samples
6.68×10-3
8.75×10-4
1.22×10-4
4.01×10-6
2.49×10-7
Rabies control –repeat run 5.99×10-3 2.90×10-3 1.04×10-3 2.67×10-4 8.00×10-5

The rabies control plasmid was sequenced a second time using a separate protocol at a different service provider and listed here for comparison. Mismatch rates are ‘per base pair’ so that they can be compared directly across samples and platforms. Phred error rates for the Q scores are shown in the heading.