Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 2;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-53

Table 3.

Percentage inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and IC50 values

Sample
Type of cell line
 
Colo – 205
Y79
HepG2
SupT1
  %age Inhibition IC50 Value % age Inhibition IC50 Value % age Inhibition IC50 Value % age Inhibition IC50 Value
APE (200 μg/mL)
68.33 ± 1.41*
29.57 ± 2.02
66.40 ± 5.44*
35.94 ± 2.10
53.33 ± 1.21*
44.31 ± 3.07
61.34 ± 1.32*
37.00 ± 2.38
APA (200 μg/mL)
92.25 ± 2.05***
18.91 ± 1.06
92.80 ± 6.34*
26.74 ± 1.34
88.52 ± 3.04**
27.03 ± 1.03
94.12 ± 3.34**
26.89 ± 3.24
Doxorubicin (Standard) 10 μg/mL
94.81 ± 3.42
0.41 ± 0.08
94.20 ± 4.11
0.39 ± 0.10
89.18 ± 3.42
0.47 ± 0.08
95.20 ± 3.11
0.39 ± 0.11
DMSO 2% (Solvent control) 6.67 ± 1.67 -- 3.33 ± 0.78 -- 3.13 ± 1.01 -- 4.33 ± 0.78 --

Values were the means of four replicates ± standard deviation (SD). Significant p value (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p <0.05 were obtained by Student’s t test analysis. Composite treatments were compared using one-way analysis of variances (ANOVA) and probability values were found to be equal to or less than 0.05 for all the four cell lines.