Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Nov 22;41(3):562–576. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0691-4

Table 4.

Small (S) vs. Unruptured (U) vs. Ruptured (R) comparative analysis for 35 mm ≤ Dmax ≤ 51 mm (S), 50 mm ≤ Dmax ≤ 55 mm (U), and Dmax > 60 mm (R). Sample sizes: 12 sAAA (S), 28 uAAA (U), and 65 rAAA (R). Null hypothesis: “there is no difference in the curvature index among the small, unruptured, and ruptured AAA subgroups”.

Parameter p-value (Normality Test) p-value (F-test or Kruskal-Wallis) Null Hypothesis Comparisons
KG R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0112
U: 0.0221
0.0556 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
KM R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0019
U: 0.0002
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Rejected
GAA R: < 0.0001
S: 0.9101
U: 0.2515
0.2084 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
MAA R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0004
U: 0.1008
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
K1AA R: 0.0004
S: 0.0002
U: <0.0001
0.1240 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
K2AA R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0010
U: < 0.0001
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Rejected
GLN R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0004
U: 0.1008
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
MLN R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0007
U: 0.0001
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
K1LN R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0004
U: 0.0029
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
K2LN R: < 0.0001
S: 0.0005
U: 0.0018
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
Dmax R: 0.0003
S: 0.0993
U: 0.1333
< 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Rejected S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected