Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Nov 22;41(3):562–576. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0691-4

Table 5.

Size-matched Small (S) vs. Unruptured (U) vs. Ruptured (R) comparative analysis for 35 mm ≤ Dmax ≤ 51 mm. Sample sizes: 12 sAAA (S), 34 uAAA (U), 10 rAAA (R). Null hypothesis: “there is has no difference in the curvature index among the small, unruptured, and ruptured AAA subgroups”.

Parameter p-value (Normality Test) p-value (F-test or Kruskal-Wallis) Null Hypothesis Comparisons
KG R: 0.3689
S: 0.0112
U: 0.1430
0.1441 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
KM R: 0.0934
S: 0.0019
U: 0.0008
0.0324 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Rejected
GAA R: 0.0070
S: 0.9101
U: 0.2421
0.5046 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
MAA R: 0.6070
S: 0.0004
U: 0.0804
0.1724 (F-test) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
K1AA R: 0.2615
S: 0.0002
U: 0.0156
0.1651 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted
K2AA R: 0.2420
S: 0.0010
U: 0.0003
0.0094 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Rejected
GLN R: 0.1193
S: 0.0004
U: 0.0106
0.0004 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
MLN R: 0.0028
S: 0.0007
U: 0.0002
0.0003 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Rejected R&U, Rejected
K1LN R: 0.0025
S: 0.0004
U: 0.0023
0.0004 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Rejected
K2LN R: 0.6856
S: 0.0005
U: 0.0007
0.0002 (Kruskal-Wallis) Rejected S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Rejected
Dmax R: 0.0939
S: 0.0993
U: 0.0028
0.7244 (Kruskal-Wallis) Accepted S&U, Accepted S&R, Accepted R&U, Accepted