Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;110(11):E1045–E1054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219563110

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Length of cell cycle phases for DCX+ cells. (A and B) DA method; for experimental outline, see Fig. 2F. Confocal analysis at 3.5 h (triple-labeled cell; arrow). (B) TS and TC determined by DA. (CE) Short PLM method (for experimental outline see Fig. 3G). (C) Confocal analysis 3 h after CldU (triple-labeled cell; arrow). (D) Ratio of triple-labeled cells (DCX+pHH3+CldU+) to mitotic DCX+ cells. (E) TG2 and TM quantified by PLM Least square fit; line a, y = 0.268 × −0.168; R2 = 0.985. The CL method and the long version of PLM cannot be reliably used for DCX+ cells because of their active tangential migration (Results). (Scale bars: 25 μm.)

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure