Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;5(4):192–200. doi: 10.2478/v10102-012-0032-3

Table 4.

Effect of ceftriaxone plus sulbactam with VRP1034 on xanthine oxidase (XO) and gluathione s transferase (GST)in cadmium exposed group after 21 days of treatment.

Groups Plasma (nmol/min/ml) Liver (nmole/min/g tissue) Kidney (nmole/min/g tissue) Brain (nmol/min/g tissue)
XO GST XO GST XO GST XO GST
Control group 135.4±8.56 14.33±1.52 44.10±2.65 25.12±1.87 58.84±4.23 36.41±3.78 111.02±7.49 9.11±1.02
Cd exposed group 296.3±10.22*** 18.96±1.10*** 87.33±6.02*** 51.05±2.64*** 64.20±3.63* 42.16±2.81*** 144.89±9.48*** 13.40±1.47***
Ceftriaxone plus sulbactam with VRP1034 group 168.7±14.31*** 13.74±0.55*** 71.82±4.49*** 37.0±2.09*** 56.22±1.77*** 40.33±1.59ns 139.45±8.80ns 10.00±1.12***

All data are Mean ± SD of each group. The XO and GST levels were expressed in the plasma (µmole/min/ml) whereas in the tissues (µmol/g tissue). Newman keuls test was performed for statistical significance between control group vs Cd exposed group and Cd exposed group vs ceftriaxone plus sulbactam with VRP1034 treated group.

***

Where p<0.001 (highly significant)

**

p<0.01(significant)

*

p<0.05 (significant)

Ns

p>0.05 (non significant).