Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 18;7:6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00006

Table 1.

Linear regression analyses of how emotional contagion scales predict smile authenticity recognition (accuracy and d′) and error types (false alarm rate and miss rate).

Emotional contagion B Beta T P
DEPENDENT VARIABLE: ACCURACY - F TEST: P= 0.026; R2 = 0.07
ECS_pos −0.24 −0.25 −2.31 0.023
ECS_neg 0.17 0.27 2.45 0.016
DEPENDENT VARIABLE: d′ - F TEST: P = 0.003; R2 = 0.10
ECS_pos −0.07 −0.30 −2.78 0.006
ECS_neg 0.05 0.34 3.20 0.002
DEPENDENT VARIABLE: FALSE ALARM RATE - F TEST: P = 0.003; R2 = 0.09
ECS_pos 0.02 0.35 3.22 0.002
ECS_neg −0.01 −0.30 −2.78 0.006
DEPENDENT VARIABLE: MISS RATE - F TEST: P = 0.348; R2 = 0.001
ECS_pos 0.005 0.08 0.67 0.502
ECS_neg −0.007 −0.16 −1.46 0.148