Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;81(4):E178–E185. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24447

TABLE II.

Outcome fo Retrograde Approach Both Period

N (retro/total) 04′–07′ 67/515 08′–10′ 214/734 P-value <0.001
Antegrade success 431/480 (89.8%) 454/499 (91.0%) n.s
Procedural success 41 (61.1%) 153 (71.4%) n.s
Guidewire success 47 (70.1%) 177 (82.7) n.s
Strategic variables
 Retrograde wiring 26 (38.8%) 123 (57.4%) 0.008
 Kissing wire technique 33 (49.2%) 93 (43.4%) 0.41
 Long shaft OTW balloon 16 (23.8%) 41 (19.2%) 0.4
 Corsair catheter 0 (0%) 83 (38.7%) <0.001
 CART 12 (17.9%) 10 (4.7%) <0.001
 Reverse-CART 0 (0%) 22 (10.2%) 0.006
Complication
 CTO perforation 0 (0%) 5 (2.3%) n.s
 Channel perforation 3 (4.5%) 2 (0.9%) n.s
 Channel dissection 1 (1.5%) 5 (2.3%) n.s
 Donor vessel occlusion 0 (0%) 3 (1.4%) n.s