Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Resuscitation. 2012 May 3;83(12):1484–1490. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.04.014

Table 1.

Cohort description.

N 215 Resuscitation preparedness
Age, years median [IQR] 27 [23, 33]  Training and education
Nationality   Viewed as strength 31 (14%)
 Motswana 188 (87%)   Viewed as weakness 80 (37%)
 African, Non-Motswana 22 (10%)  Equipment/medications
 Non-African 5 (2%)   Viewed as strength 44 (20%)
Female 156 (73%)   Viewed as weakness 94 (44%)
English fluency 114 (53%)  Staff/teamwork
Setswana fluency 181 (84%)   Viewed as strength 91 (42%)
Speak English at work, n (%) 140 (65%)   Viewed as weakness 12 (6%)
Speak English at home, n (%) 14 (7%)  Clinical experience
Does not use English or Setswana at home 29 (14%)   Viewed as strength 69 (32%)
Comfortable reading English, n (%) 213 (99%)   Viewed as Weakness 41 (19%)
Nurse 153 (71%) Demonstrated CPR skills competence (AHA BLS course passing criteria for certification) 214 (99.5%)
Years since school graduation, median [IQR] 5 [2, 10]  Did not require remediation Required remediation 75 (35%)
Location of work ED, OR, ICU, or “more than one ward” 67 (31%)   Single skills test 71 (33%)
High frequency of resuscitation (>1/month) 84 (39%)   Both manikins 68 (32%)
Never trained in CPR 155 (72%) Identified as Potential Instructor 35 (16%)