Table 2.
Summary of impact of peer-reviewed psychological articles on conspiracist ideation published in 2012.
| Citation | Google hitsa | Recursive hypotheses |
|---|---|---|
| LOG12 | 443 (2) | 10 |
| Grebe and Nattrass (2012) | 13 (9) | 0 |
| Briones et al. (2012) | 11 (9) | 0 |
| Hamdy and Gomaa (2012) | 12 (5) | 0 |
| Nattrass (2012) | 13 (3) | 0 |
| Hoyt et al. (2012) | 11 (1) | 0 |
| Vu et al. (2012) | 10 (3) | 0 |
| de Zavala and Cichocka (2012) | 8 (6) | 0 |
| Clark (2012) | 7 (1) | 0 |
| Aupers (2012) | 5 (2) | 0 |
| Baleta (2012) | 6 (1) | 0 |
| Tun et al. (2012) | 5 (2) | 0 |
| Moritz et al. (2012) | 4 (1) | 0 |
| Swami et al. (2012) | 3 (3) | 0 |
| Barbieri and Klausen (2012) | 3 (2) | 0 |
| Collins and Chamberlain (2012) | 3 (1) | 0 |
| Cook (2012) | 3 (1) | 0 |
| Schneider-Zioga (2012) | 3 (1) | 0 |
| Drinkwater et al. (2012) | 2 (1) | 0 |
| Gholizadeh and Hook (2012) | 2 (1) | 0 |
| Liebich (2012) | 2 (1) | 0 |
| Krychman (2012) | 1 (1) | 0 |
aTotal number of hits, with hits in Google Scholar in parentheses.