Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 1;40(3):031917. doi: 10.1118/1.4792296

Table 2.

Calculated results for SdNR, FHWM of the ASF, and MTF. Data are separated into the five groups of configurations that were outlined in Sec. 2B. The configuration with 29 projection views, a 28° angular span, and an even dose distribution resulted in the highest “quality factor” value for an exposure of 100 mAs. MMOC stands for more mAs on central projections. LMOC stands for less mAs on central projections.

Group Number of projections Total angular span Entrance dose (mR) Detector resolution (μm) mAs distribution SdNR FWHM of ASF MTF at 10% QF
1 15 14° 727 140 Uniform 5.72 ± 0.21 7.80 4.14 ± 0.01 0.85
1 15 28° 682 140 Uniform 5.44 ± 0.20 4.08 4.20 ± 0.03 1.00
2 15 28° 682 140 Uniform 5.44 ± 0.20 4.08 4.20 ± 0.03 1.00
2 29 28° 656 140 Uniform 5.81 ± 0.16 4.10 4.25 ± 0.02 1.02
3 29 28° 656 140 Uniform 5.81 ± 0.16 4.10 4.25 ± 0.02 1.02
3 29 28° 665 140 LMOC 4.97 ± 0.20 4.03 4.23±0.01 0.98
3 29 28° 675 140 MMOC 5.04 ± 0.16 4.05 4.25 ± 0.01 0.98
4 29 28° 385 140 Uniform 4.32 ± 0.14 4.14 4.30 ± 0.01 0.93
4 29 28° 523 140 Uniform 4.87 ± 0.12 3.93 4.28 ± 0.02 0.98
4 29 28° 656 140 Uniform 5.81 ± 0.16 4.10 4.25 ± 0.02 1.02
4 29 28° 791 140 Uniform 6.06 ± 0.24 4.04 4.23 ± 0.02 1.04
5 15 28° 682 70 Uniform 2.97 ± 0.08 4.30 5.15 ± 0.05 0.91
5 15 28° 682 140 Uniform 5.44 ± 0.20 4.08 4.20 ± 0.03 1.00