Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2011 Jul 11;20(5):441–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00148.x

Table 1.

A Comparison of Group Characteristics Between Coexisting Independent Depression and Substance-Induced Depression in Actively Substance-Dependent Individuals

Independent Depression,
Current or in remission
Substance-induced Depression,
(n=176)
Current
(n=66)
Age, in years (SD) 38.5 (10.2) 36.4 (9.1)

Ethnicity, %
African American 31.5 39.9
Caucasian 39.4 32.7
Hispanic 18.9 18.8
Asian 6.1 5.5
Other 4 3.1

Relationship Status, %
In a relationship
59 54

Education, in years (SD) 13.9 (2.1) 12.7 (2.3)

Employment, %
Employed
61 60

Female, % * 40.3 (n=71) 24.2 (n=16)

Coc Dependence, %** 24.4 (n=43) 48.4 (n=32)

Opioid Dependence, % 22.2 (n=35) 33.3 (n=22)

THC Dependence, %** 55.7 (n=98) 19.7 (n=12)

HAMD (SD)*** , (c) 16.22 (5.8) 10.43 (3.9)

Age of initiating regular
drug use, in years (SD)
19.2 (6.2) 19.3 (6.6)

Number of stressors (SD) 1.1 (1.1) 1.23 (1)

Current Alc abuse, % 5.2 (n=9) 4.5 (n=3)

Current Alc dep, % 15.3 (n=27) 16.7 (n=11)

Past AUD (1),% 40.3 (n=71) 33.3 (n=22)

PTSD (2), % * 13.1 (n=23) 4.5 (n=3)

SIAD (3), % 5.1 (n=9) 9.1 (n=6)
*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.001;

***

p < 0.005

(a)

Values in the table are means (standard deviations) or percent (number)

(b)

Test statistics are chi-square for dichotomous independent variables, and t-tests for continuous variables

(c)

HAMD scores were obtained from subjects with active diagnoses

(1)

Alcohol Use Disorder,

(2)

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder,

(3)

Substance-induced Anxiety Disorder