Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 1;110(9):148–158. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0148

Table 3. SCIT versus SLIT: the available evidence.

Studies on: SCIT SLIT
Dose-effect relationship studied for various allergens (14) studied for various allergens (14)
Definition of the optimal dose documented in one DBPC trial of a mite allergen (23) documented in one DBPC trial of a grass-pollen tablet (24)
Efficacy after 1 year of treatment determined for multiple allergens in DBPC trials, some of which were on a large scale (10, 37, 39, 40, e1, e2) determined in large-scale DBPC trials for grass-pollen extracts (11, 26, 30, e13e19)
Efficacy after 2 and 3 years of treatment shown in trials of various allergens (e3) shown in large-scale DBPC trials of grass-pollen extracts (29, 30, e13)
Sustained therapeutic benefit shown in multiple trials, most of which were controlled (6, 24, 36, e20) shown in trials of adequate size for grass-pollen extracts for adults (27, 28)
Efficacy for allergic asthma shown for various allergens (39) small effect in meta-analysis (e21)
Asthma prevention no DBPC trials; positive findings in controlled trials (e22) no DBPC trials; positive findings (e23)
Prevention of new sensitization shown in controlled trials of individual allergens (e22) no DBPC trials; positive findings (e24)

SCIT, subcutaneous immunotherapy; SLIT, sublingual immunotherapy; DBPC, double-blind, placebo-controlled