Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov 8;24(3):760–773. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00163

Table 1.

Clusters and Their Peaks Showing a Main Effect of Format-match, Congruency, or a Format-match × Congruency Interaction (p < .05 Family-wise Error Whole-brain Corrected)

MNl Coordinates
Region/Topography Voxels x y z Z Score
fMRl
Format-match
 Right fusiform gyrus 366 +39 −54 −15 6.87
 Left fusiform gyrus 103 −45 −60 −9 5.62
 Left inferior temporal gyrus 37 −36 −78 −9 5.72
Congruency
 Right insula 32 +27 +24 0 5.79
 Anterior cingulate cortex 3 −9 +18 +42 4.80
 Right middle frontal gyrus 1 +39 +54 +15 4.70
 Right inferior frontal gyrus 1 +39 +33 +15 4.59
 Right inferior frontal gyrus 1 +42 +30 +12 4.60
Format-match × Congruency
 No voxels survived correction

SPM Coordinates
x y Time

EEG
Stimulus-locked analyses
 Format-match
  Left parietal 54 −18 −24 +460 4.81
  Right frontal 3 +48 + 12 +490 4.61
 Congruency
  Left temporal 24 −36 −12 +540 4.86
 Format-match × Congruency
  No voxels survived correction
Response-locked analyses
 Format-match
  No voxels survived correction
 Congruency
  No voxels survived correction
 Format-match × Congruency
  Right frontal 12 +24 +6 −150 4.44
  Right frontal 22 +30 + 18 −150 4.28

Time in EEG stimulus-locked analyses is relative to stimulus onset and in response-locked analyses is relative to response onset.