Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechnol Adv. 2013 Jan 26;31(4):438–449. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.006

Table 1. Comparison of different biosensors for MTB detection.

Technology Biomarker Limit of detection Reference
QCM Whole MTB bacilli 105 CFUmL (He and Zhang, 2002)
MSPQC NH3 & CO2
absorption
10 CFU/mL (Ren et al., 2008a)
RBS Breathalyzer
Fluorometry
Ag85B antigen 50-75 CFU/mL (McNerney et al., 2010)
Interferometric Biosensor 38-kDa antigen NR (Nagel et al., 2008)
SPR CFP-10 antigen 100 ng/mL (Hong et al., 2011)
DMR NR 20 CFU/mL (Chun, 2009,
Lee et al., 2008)
SPCE Ag360 & Ag231
antigens
1 ng/ml (Diaz-Gonzalez et al., 2005)
Enzymatic
Immonosensor
Antibody to
mycolic acid
NR (Thanyani et al., 2008)
Electroosmosis mediated
Microtip
Whole MTB bacilli 8 × 103 CFU/mL (Yeo et al., 2009)
Acoustic Sensor Whole MTB bacilli 2 × 103 CFU/mL (Stocher et al., 2003)

Abbreviations: QCM, quartz crystal microbalance; MSPQC, multi-channel series piezoelectric quartz crystal; RBS, Rapid Biosensor Systems; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; DMR, diagnostic magnetic resonance; SPCE, screen-printed carbon electrode; MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; CFU, colony forming unit; NR, Not reported.