Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Feb 5;19(6):1603–1611. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2995

Table 1.

A: Patient characteristics by CHFR Expression
Total CHFR
low
CHFR
high
p-
value*

N=41
(%)
N=16
(%)
N=25
(%)

Age (years) Median 63 65 62 0.13
Mean 64 66 62.4
SD 7.7 8.8 6.7

Race Caucasian 28 (68) 12 (75) 16 (64) 0.46
African American 13 (32) 4 (25) 9 (36)

Sex M 40 (98) 15 (94) 25(100) 0.39
F 1 (2) 1 (6) 0

Treatment CBCDA/TAX 32 (78) 12 (75) 20 (80) 0.72
Bev/CBCDA/TAX 9 (22) 4 (25) 5 (20)

ECOG PS 0 11 (27) 5 (31) 6 (24) 0.22
1 15 (37) 8 (50) 7 (28)
2 6 (15) 2 (13) 4 (16)
3 9 (22) 1 (6) 8 (32)

Response CR 1 (2) 1 (6) 0(0) 0.034
PR 12 (29) 4 (25) 8 (32)
SD 12 (29) 8 (50) 4 (16)
PD 16 (39) 3 (19) 13 (52)

Squamous cell
Histology carcinoma (SCC)
non-SCC
9 (22)
32 (78)
3 (19)
13 (81)
6 (24)
19 (76)
1.00

Number of
lines of
additional
therapy
0 26 (63) 9 (56) 17 (68) 0.22
1 10 (24) 3 (19) 7 (28)
2 4 (10) 3 (19) 1 (4)
3 1 (2) 1 (6) 0 (0)

Age-category >=65 17 (41) 8 (50) 9 (36) 0.38
<65 24(59) 8 (50) 16 (64)

ECOG PS-
category
good 26 (63) 13 (81) 13 (52) 0.06
poor 15(37) 3 (19) 12 (48)

Response-
category
Clinical benefit 25 (61) 13 (81) 12 (48) 0.033
Progression 16 (39) 3 (19) 13 (52)

Time of
diagnosis
before 2005 14(34) 5(31) 9 (36) 0.75
2005 and later 27(66) 11 (69) 16 (64)

2 or more lines
of treatment
no 26 (63) 9 (56) 17 (68) 0.446
yes 15 (37) 7 (44) 8 (32)
B: Patient characteristics of the validation set
total CHFR low CHFR high p-
value*

20 7 (%) 13 (%)

Age Mean 67.4 61.5 0.3
Median 69 66

Race C 12 (60) 4 (58) 8 (62) 1
AA 6 (30) 2 (28) 4 (31)
unknown 2 (10) 1 (14) 1 (7)

Sex M 16 (80) 5 (71.4) 11 (84.6) 0.48
F 4 (20) 2 (28.6) 2 (15.4)

Treatment CDDP/TAX 17 (85) 5 (71) 12 (70) 0.33
CDDP/TAX/Avastin 3 (15) 2 (29) 1 (30)

ECOG PS 0 4 (20) 2 (29) 2 (15) 0.84
1 6 (30) 2 (29) 4 (31)
2 6 (30) 2 (29) 4 (31)
unknown 4 (20) 1 (15) 3 (23)

Histology SCC 1 (5) 0 (0) 1 (7.7) 0.34
non-SCC 19 (95) 7 (100) 12 (92.3)

Clinical
benefit
yes 11 (55) 7 (100) 4 (31) 0.03
non 8 (40) 0 (0) 8 (62)
Unknown 1 (5) 0 (0) 1 (7)

Time of
diagnosis
Before 2005 2 (10) 1(14.3) 1 (7.7) 0.64
After 2005 18 (80) 6 (85.7) 12 (92.3)

2 or more
lines of
therapy
yes 3 (15) 2(29) 1(8)
no 17 (85) 5(71) 12(92) 0.22
*

The p-value is calculated by ANOVA for age in years; Fisher’s exact test for gender, treatment, ECOG PS, response, histology, and additional lines of treatment; Chi-sqaure test for the remaining categorical covariates; and log-rank test for survival.

*

The p-value is calculated by ANOVA for age in years; Fisher’s exact test for gender, treatment, ECOG PS, clinical benefit, histology