Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surgery. 2012 Dec 4;153(4):473–480. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.068

Table 3.

Importance of information to patients, based on 6-point Likert Scale

Mean Likert score for all 3 techniques* Standard Laparoscopic Robotic p- value
Overall description of procedure 5.49
 General description of procedure 5.60 5.52 5.61 5.69 < 0.0001
 Technical details of procedure 5.30 5.17 5.32 5.44 < 0.0001
 Clear statement procedure is new or standard 5.50 5.37 5.55 5.59 < 0.0001
Overall risks and benefits 5.75
 Risks 5.80 5.79 5.81 5.78 0.19
 Benefits 5.71 5.68 5.73 5.71 0.065
 Risks unknown 5.77 5.74 5.80 5.77 0.027
 Benefits unknown 5.71 5.65 5.74 5.68 0.006
Other surgeons’ experience 5.16
 Number of times procedure done by anyone 5.14 4.90 5.16 5.40 < 0.0001
 Other surgeons’ outcomes 5.17 5.03 5.19 5.33 < 0.0001
Your surgeon’s experience 5.60
 Number of times procedure done by your surgeon 5.62 5.52 5.62 5.70 < 0.0001
 Your surgeon’s outcomes 5.59 5.53 5.60 5.65 < 0.0001
 Your surgeon’s first time 5.81 5.81 5.82 5.82 0.084
 Surgeon’s special training 5.64 5.55 5.65 5.73 < 0.0001
Overall surgeon’s personal interest 4.50
 Plans to publish article 3.94 3.90 3.97 4.00 < 0.0001
 Doing research 4.45 4.39 4.47 4.50 < 0.0001
 Paid consultant 5.13 5.08 5.14 5.18 < 0.0001
*

Skillings-Mack p < 0.0001 comparing mean Likert scores for the 5 categories of information in bold

Skillings-Mack comparison of Likert scores across all 3 surgical techniques