Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 19;8(3):e57139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057139

Table 2. Achieved maximum growth rate ( µMAX) and light intensity required to reach that rate (EM µd) estimated from growth versus irradiance fit (R2 of each fit are presented) using eq. 1.

Species EM µd ( µmol photons m−2 s−1) Error µMAX (day−1) Error R2 of Fit p-value Dunnett's (for µMAX) Tukey HSD (for µMAX)
C. snowii (CHL5) 585 25 1.12 0.14 0.98 <.0001 a
P. mucicola (CYA1) 279 5 0.80 0.03 0.98 0.0002 b
A. falcatus (CHL1) 503 30 0.73 0.08 0.96 0.0095 b
P. morum (CHL2) 588 39 0.72 0.08 0.95 0.0151 b
O. lacustris (CHL3) 340 2 0.55 0.06 0.91 1 a
C. obovata (CRY1) 605 39 0.50 0.05 0.94 0.9688 ab
A. spiroïdes (CYA4) 187 6 0.43 0.03 0.87 0.2497 ab
M. flos-aquae (CYA2) 369 64 0.41 0.06 0.73 0.1189 b
P. boryanum (CHL4) 403 19 0.41 0.02 0.97 0.1189 b
A. flos-aquae (CYA3) 252 6 0.38 0.05 0.81 0.0257 a
A. granulata (BAC2) 375 18 0.34 0.01 0.95 0.0032 a
F. crotonensis (BAC3) 255 20 0.26 0.02 0.90 <.0001 b
All species 401 29 0.54 0.05 0.48 1 -

The achieved maximal growth rate ( µMAX) obtained for individual species was compared to the fit obtained for all species grouped (All species) using Dunnett's test (p<0.05). Subsequent comparisons with Tukey test (p<0.05) were done to rank species in each subgroup (higher, equal or lower than All species µMAX). Presented error corresponds to the 95% confidence interval.