Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 18;32(4):697–713. doi: 10.1002/sim.5534

Table 3.

Results of the model defined by Equations 1 and 2 for Z(A) = (1,A,G,E,S)T fitted on the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study data.

Covariate Regression coefficient Estimate 95% CI
Model intercepts β0.12 − 8.184 ( − 12.028, − 5.245)
β0.13 − 11.150 ( − 12.006, − 10.106)
β0.23 − 7.472 ( − 10.168, − 5.265)
Age (years) βA.12 0.051 (0.013, 0.104)
βA.13 0.101 (0.089, 0.111)
βA.23 0.065 (0.039, 0.097)
Gender (men versus women) βG.12 0.340 ( − 0.050, 0.744)
βG.13 0.298 (0.159, 0.427)
βG.23 0.412 (0.128, 0.707)
Education (10 years or more) βE.12 − 0.025 ( − 0.472, 0.355)
βE.13 − 0.228 ( − 0.381, − 0.077)
βE.23 0.159 ( − 0.144, 0.507)
Smoking (current versus never/ex) βS.12 0.203 ( − 0.155, 0.591)
βS.13 0.503 (0.383, 0.644)
βS.23 0.347 (0.124, 0.647)
Time spent in state 2 (years) γ − 0.001 ( − 0.021, 0.021)

A = age, G = gender, E = education, S = smoking. We assume transition intensities qij (i,j) ∈ {(1,2),(1,3),(2,3)} to be piecewise constant and introduce history in the process by fitting the time spent in state 2 as a time dependent covariate in q23. We based the confidence intervals on 450 bootstrap samples.