Table 3.

Results of ${\mathrm{Chi}}^2$ analysis are shown. The table shows the individual distribution of RCM parameters with respective diagnoses, following blinded image analysis by two independent investigators. Data expressed as presence of features in % of examined cases. A $p$-value of $<0.05$ was considered significant.

	MF	PARA	SEZ	LYP	NO
INVESTIGATOR 1
Spongiosis	94.7b	20	100	100	11.1
Loss of dermarcation	94.7b	0	100	100	11.1
Epidermal disarray	89.5a	40	100	100	22.2
Hyporefractile papillae	78.9	20	100	100	11.1
Epidermal atypical lymphocytes	73.7b	0	100	75	0
Vesicle-like structures	73.7	0	100	50	0
Junctional atypical lymphocytes	73.3b	0	100	100	0
Keratinocyte elongation of nuclei	63.2	0	0	25	0
Dendritic cells	52.6	0	100	0	0
Hole-like perforations	21.2	0	50	25	0
INVESTIGATOR 2	MF	PARA	SEZ	LYP	NO
Spongiosis	100b	0	100	75	22.2
Epidermal disarray	100b	20	100	100	22.2
Loss of dermarcation	94.7b	20	100	100	22.2
Hyporefractile papillae	84.2b	40	100	100	0
Junctional atypical lymphocytes	84.2b	0	50	100	0
Epidermal atypical lymphocytes	68.4a	0	100	75	0
Vesicle-like structures	52.6	0	100	25	11.1
Hole-like perforations	47.4	20	100	0	11.1
Keratinocyte elongation of nuclei	42.1	0	0	0	0
Dendritic cells	0	0	50	50	36.8

^a$\mathit{p}<0,001$.

^b$\mathit{p}<0,0001$.