Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 28;109(6):1638–1657. doi: 10.1152/jn.00698.2012

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.

Samples of individual units' responses to multiple call types. When multiple call types were vocalized while recording from stable single units, the responses were compared between the different vocalizations. A: sample spectrogram (top) and raw neural trace (bottom) of a unit sampled while the animal made a trill (green) and a twitter (red) in rapid succession. This unit was suppressed during the twitter but seemed to be excited by the preceding trill. B and C: vocal RMI distributions are shown for 2 units both of which showed consistent responses to the multiple call types, one consistently suppressed (B) and one consistently excited (C). N is the number of vocalizations of each call type, and the corresponding mean RMI is indicated. In contrast, some units like the sample in A exhibited opposite responses during different call types, as illustrated in D and E.