Table 2. Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.

	scanned plaster cast vs plaster cast						scanned impression vs plaster cast							scanned plaster cast vs scanned impression
measurements	meandifference	95% CI			p-value		meandifference		95% CI			p-value		meandifference		95% CI			p-value
A–B	−0.385	[−0.420	…	−0.349]	0.000	*		−0.360	[−0.426	…	−0.294]	0.000	*		−0.024	[−0.088	…	0.039]	0.411
B–C	−0.545	[−0.606	…	−0.484]	0.000	*		−0.354	[−0.429	…	−0.279]	0.000	*		−0.191	[−0.293	…	−0.088]	0.002	*
C–D	−0.573	[−0.688	…	−0.459]	0.000	*		−0.424	[−0.486	…	−0.361]	0.000	*		−0.150	[−0.269	…	−0.031]	0.019	*
D–E	−0.466	[−0.544	…	−0.388]	0.000	*		−0.394	[−0.459	…	−0.330]	0.000	*		−0.072	[−0.133	…	−0.010]	0.028	*
A–C	0.077	[−0.008	…	0.162]	0.071			0.115	[−0.007	…	0.237]	0.061			−0.038	[−0.100	…	0.023]	0.194
C–E	0.053	[−0.079	…	0.184]	0.390			0.068	[−0.030	…	0.165]	0.152			−0.015	[−0.182	…	0.151]	0.842
A–E	0.367	[0.311	…	0.423]	0.000	*		0.587	[0.502	…	0.672]	0.000	*		−0.220	[−0.308	…	−0.131]	0.000	*
B–D	0.004	[−0.066	…	0.074]	0.900			0.237	[0.183	…	0.291]	0.000	*		−0.233	[−0.339	…	−0.128]	0.001	*
F–G	−0.340	[−0.394	…	−0.286]	0.000	*		−0.413	[−0.528	…	−0.297]	0.000	*		0.073	[−0.044	…	0.189]	0.191
G–H	−0.579	[−0.649	…	−0.510]	0.000	*		−0.457	[−0.632	…	−0.283]	0.000	*		−0.122	[−0.265	…	0.022]	0.087
H–I	−0.420	[−0.487	…	−0.352]	0.000	*		−0.352	[−0.455	…	−0.250]	0.000	*		−0.067	[−0.124	…	−0.011]	0.024	*
I–J	−0.390	[−0.449	…	−0.311]	0.000	*		−0.509	[−0.581	…	−0.437]	0.000	*		0.120	[0.070	…	0.170]	0.000	*
F–H	−0.054	[−0.120	…	0.012]	0.096			0.069	[−0.062	…	0.201]	0.265			−0.123	[−0.243	…	−0.003]	0.045	*
H–J	−0.068	[−0.161	…	0.024]	0.128			−0.023	[−0.138	…	0.091]	0.659			−0.045	[−0.170	…	0.079]	0.432
F–J	0.419	[0.380	…	0.458]	0.000	*		0.331	[0.185	…	0.476]	0.001	*		0.089	[−0.050	…	0.227]	0.182
G–I	0.038	[−0.020	…	0.096]	0.175			0.229	[0.120	…	0.338]	0.001	*		−0.191	[−0.312	…	−0.070]	0.006	*