Table 6.
Regression Models Predicting Alcohol Cravings per Week from IATs and Explicit Predictors.
| Alcohol Cravings B | SE B | t | Cohen’s d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drinking Identity IAT | ||||
| Gender | −0.24 | 1.03 | −0.24 | 0.03 |
| Drinking Identity IAT | 4.11** | 1.35 | 3.05 | 0.36 |
| ASCS | 0.89*** | 0.10 | 8.50 | 1.00 |
| IAT × ASCS | −0.07 | 0.23 | −0.29 | 0.03 |
| Alcohol Excitement IAT | ||||
| Gender | −1.84 | 0.95 | −1.94 | 0.23 |
| Alcohol Excitement IAT | 1.90 | 1.20 | 1.59 | 0.19 |
| DMQ-Enhance | 4.62*** | 0.40 | 11.48 | 1.37 |
| IAT × DMQ-Enhance | −0.14 | 1.01 | −0.14 | 0.02 |
| Alcohol Approach IAT | ||||
| Gender | −1.41 | 1.19 | −1.19 | 0.14 |
| Alcohol Approach IAT | −6.95 | 8.29 | −0.84 | 0.10 |
| BAS-Fun | 0.97*** | 0.26 | 3.72 | 0.44 |
| IAT × BAS-Fun | 0.88 | 0.72 | 1.22 | 0.15 |
| Alcohol Cope BIAT | ||||
| Gender | −2.89** | 0.92 | −3.14 | 0.37 |
| Alcohol Cope BIAT | 0.43 | 1.04 | 0.42 | 0.05 |
| DMQ-Cope | 8.66*** | 0.63 | 13.82 | 1.63 |
| BIAT × DMQ Cope | −1.97 | 1.35 | −1.46 | 0.17 |
| Combined IAT Model | ||||
| Gender | −0.46 | 1.18 | −0.39 | 0.05 |
| Drinking Identity IAT | 5.32** | 1.52 | 3.49 | 0.42 |
| Alcohol Excitement IAT | 3.68* | 1.57 | 2.34 | 0.28 |
| Approach Avoid IAT | 0.29 | 1.80 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
| Alcohol Cope BIAT | 1.02 | 1.33 | 0.76 | 0.09 |
Note. IAT scores and explicit predictors were grand-mean centered. Gender was dummy-coded (0 = men, 1 = women). Cohen’s d = 2t/√df. The regression models used ordinary least squares regression. Alcohol cravings = score on the Alcohol Craving Scale – Short Form, Revised. ASCS = Alcohol Self-Concept Scale. DMQ-Enhance = the enhance subscale of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire; DMQ-Cope = the coping subscale of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire; BAS-Fun = the fun-seeking subscale of the Behavioral Activation Scale.
Corrected alpha = .029.
*
p < .029.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.