Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Apr;92(4):287–296. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827d620d

TABLE 2.

Selection-corrected, adjusted physical health and functioning by postacute care setting

Adjusted
Outcome
Adjusted
Outcome
Percentage
Difference
Adjusted
Outcome
Percentage
Difference





Home IRF IRF vs. Home SNF IRF vs. SNF
Six-month follow-up scores
PF 26.6 27.2 2.2   24.2 12.7b
RF 34.2 38.2 11.8b 33.5 13.9b
VT 47.6 47.4 −0.4   46.8 1.3  
GH 39.6 41.7 5.4   39.1 6.8a
PCS 32.0 34.3 7.4a 31.0 10.6b
Probability of scoring in the top quartile of overall sample distribution at 6-mo follow-up
PF 21.2 24.7 16.2   17.0 45.2  
RF 19.7 26.9 36.6   20.1 34.1  
VT 20.4 22.0 7.6   23.1 −4.9  
GH 12.8 29.7 132.0b 15.4 92.7b
PCS 23.4 30.2 28.9   18.6 62.1a
Probability of scoring in the bottom quartile of overall sample distribution at 6-mo follow-up
PF 27.4 30.1 9.9   48.3 −37.8b
RF 29.1 18.1 −37.9a 36.8 −50.8b
VT 24.7 27.6 12.0   34.3 −19.4  
GH 22.7 26.4 16.3   34.4 −23.4  
PCS 26.3 19.5 −25.9   32.6 −40.1b
Disability level
Severe: three or more ADLs 17.37 13.16 −24.24   29.66 −55.6b
Any ADL impairment 44.75 43.13 −3.62   62.49 −31.0b

Adjusted outcomes are based on regression analyses that control for amputation level, preamputation health functioning and disability, sociodemographic and economic characteristics of patients, as well as self-selection into alternative settings. Disability level is determined by the number of impaired basic ADLs.

a

Differences that are statistically significant at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.

b

Differences that are statistically significant at P < 0.05.