Table 2.
FDR of each classification proposal - Sim2
| Method and scenario | Mean FDR | FDR Sd | FDR p_2.5 | FDR p_50 | FDR p_97.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAPC-favorable | 0.09688 | 0.00314 | 0.09067 | 0.09687 | 0.10299 |
| Cd with DAPC-favorable | 0.07923 | 0.00607 | 0.068 | 0.0792 | 0.09132 |
| Cd-favorable | 0.00745 | 0.00049 | 0.00675 | 0.0075 | 0.00807 |
| Cd inter DAPC-favorable | 0.00257 | 0.00875 | 0 | 0 | 0.03226 |
| DAPC-normal | 0.14214 | 0.00352 | 0.13551 | 0.14219 | 0.14941 |
| Cd with DAPC- normal | 0.05079 | 0.00829 | 0.03592 | 0.05036 | 0.06696 |
| Cd- normal | 0.0133 | 0.00062 | 0.01209 | 0.01329 | 0.01456 |
| Cd inter DAPC- normal | 0.08163 | 0.04024 | 0.03704 | 0.06667 | 0.17647 |
| DAPC-unfavorable | 0.27408 | 0.00252 | 0.26896 | 0.27408 | 0.27905 |
| Cd with DAPC-unfavorable | 0.07828 | 0.0043 | 0.06844 | 0.07844 | 0.08929 |
| Cd-unfavorable | 0.05736 | 0.00407 | 0.05205 | 0.05484 | 0.06373 |
| Cd inter DAPC-unfavorable | 0.2268 | 0.11732 | 0.07143 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| DAPC-bad | 0.33817 | 0.00268 | 0.33264 | 0.33829 | 0.34306 |
| Cd with DAPC-bad | 0.12906 | 0.0063 | 0.11663 | 0.12846 | 0.13967 |
| Cd-bad | 0.11304 | 0.00462 | 0.10167 | 0.11418 | 0.12247 |
| Cd inter DAPC-bad | 0.29145 | 0.14786 | 0.09091 | 0.25 | 0.625 |