Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 15;38(3):321–329. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss127

Table I.

Demographic and Limit Setting Characteristicsa

Variable Total
Sample size, n (%) 67
Race/ethnicity, n (%)
    African American 61 (91.04)
    Other 6 (8.96)
Adolescent sex, n (%)
    Male 40 (59.70)
    Female 27 (40.30)
Adolescent age (years) 12.67 (1.34)
Adolescent zBMIb 1.48 (.89)
Parent sex, n (%)
    Male 5 (7.46)
    Female 62 (92.53)
Parent age (years) 41.81 (11.12)
Household yearly income, n (%)
    <$10,000 10 (14.93)
    $10,000–$24,000 20 (29.85)
    $25,000–$39,000 12 (17.91)
    $40,000–$54,000 12 (17.91)
    $55,000–$69,000 3 (4.48)
    $70,000–$84,000 5 (7.46)
    ≥$85,000 5 (7.46)
Parent education level, n (%)
    Some high school 5 (7.46)
    High school degree or GED 14 (20.90)
    Some college 26 (38.81)
    College graduate 14 (20.90)
    Graduate training or professional degree 8 (11.94)
Parent daily fruit and vegetable intakec 4.13 (1.75)
Parent MVPAd MET min/week (n = 54) 3,061.79 (3,909.07)
Parent walking min/week (n = 54) 303.18 (410/28)
Parent moderate PAe min/week 183.27 (310.61)
Parent vigorous PAe min/week 178.99 (312.24)
Limit setting of sedentary behaviorsf 3.32 (.86)

aValues are expressed as means (standard deviations) unless otherwise indicated. Parent and adolescent BMI were calculated using the formula weight (kg)/height(m)2. Independent samples t-tests revealed no significant differences.

bBody mass index z-score.

cFruit and vegetable consumption similar to other studies examining African American adults (see Dubowitz et al., 2008).

dModerate-to-vigorous physical activity calculating using MET values and transformed using standardized scoring protocols (see Craig et al., 2003).

ePhysical activity.

fLimit setting of sedentary behaviors were recorded on a 4-pt Likert scale: 1 = “Strongly Disagree,” 2 = “Somewhat Disagree,” 3 = “Somewhat Agree,” and 4 = “Strongly Agree.”