Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 15;5:89–95. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S43118

Table 3.

Interreviewer agreement on the titles-first screening step versus the title and abstract screening step, by reviewer pair

Reviewer pair 1
Neurologist A and pulmonologist
2
Pulmonologist and neurologist B
3
Neurologist B and gynecologist/obstetrician
4
Gynecologist/obstetrician and general surgeon
5
General surgeon and neurologist A
Overall
Citations reviewed (n) 586 584 614 588 593 2965
% agreement on titles-alone classification (95% CI) 90.6 (88.2–93.0) 87.8 (85.2–90.5) 93.8 (91.9–95.7) 93.5 (91.5–95.5) 93.7 (91.8–95.7) 91.9 (91.0–92.9)
Kappa statistic on titles-alone classification (95% CI) 0.51 (0.40–0.62) 0.40 (0.30–0.51) 0.63 (0.52–0.74) 0.67 (0.57–0.77) 0.53 (0.39–0.66) 0.54 (0.49–0.59)
% agreement on titles and abstracts classification (95% CI) 96.2 (94.7–97.8) 95.3 (93.7–97.1) 95.2 (94.4–97.5) 97.4 (96.2–98.7) 96.6 (95.2–98.1) 96.3 (95.6–97.0)
Kappa statistic on titles and abstracts classification (95% CI) 0.56 (0.39–0.72) 0.43 (0.25–0.60) 0.56 (0.40–0.71) 0.72 (0.59–0.86) 0.49 (0.29–0.68) 0.56 (0.49–0.63)

Note: Percent agreement = (number of citations with a consensus of a “yes” “yes” or “no” “no” response in a reviewer pair)/total number citations screened.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.