Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Head Neck. 2012 Apr 12;35(1):86–93. doi: 10.1002/hed.22936

Table 2.

Results of MTT assays at intermediate concentrations

MET 1 cells Absorbance P value vs.
combination
therapy
No inhibitor 1.64±0.03 <0.001
+120nM erlotinib 1.44±0.07 0.004
+150nM PPP 1.36±0.06 0.061
+120nM erlotinib+150nM PPP 1.27±0.04 n/a
+500nM erlotinib 1.24±0.03 0.007
+150nM PPP 1.39±0.03 0.001
+500nM erlotinib+150nM PPP 1.09±0.02 n/a
MET4 cells
No inhibitor 1.70±0.03 <0.001
+120nM erlotinib 1.52±0.02 <0.001
+120nM PPP 1.34±0.06 0.015
+120nM erlotinib+120nM PPP 1.17±0.06 n/a
SCC12 cells
No inhibitor 1.02±0.02 0.001
+120nM erlotinib 0.94±0.03 0.030
+240nM PPP 0.95±0.01 0.003
+120nM erlotinib+240nM PPP 0.82±0.02 n/a
SCC13 cells
No inhibitor 2.41±0.02 0.001
+120nM erlotinib 2.21±0.02 0.012
+60nM PPP 2.21±0.03 0.018
+120nM erlotinib+60nM PPP 2.00±0.04 n/a