Table 6. Coverage for seven different simulations.
| Region | Tree weights comprising measure of similarity | Mixture model parameters from trees unique to treatment-experienced patients | |||||||||
| 1 (AFR) |
|
|
R 1 |
R 2 |
R 3 |
R 4 |
|
R 1 |
1 2 |
2 3 |
1 4 |
| 100 | 97 | 97.2 | 95.2 | 95.2 | 97.2 | 100 | 100 | 97.4 | 95.8 | 94.3 | |
| 2 (AMR) |
|
|
R 1 |
R 2 |
R 3 |
R 4 |
|
R 1 |
1 2 |
4 3 |
1 4 |
| 92.5 | 95.5 | 92.8 | 93.2 | 95.3 | 92.3 | 91.2 | 95.6 | 95.6 | 96 | 95.9 | |
| 3 (EMR) |
|
|
R 1 |
R 2 |
R 3 |
R 4 |
|
4 1 |
1 2 |
2 3 |
R 4 |
| 100 | 97.8 | 96.8 | 95.1 | 95.3 | 97.4 | 100 | 97.2 | 97.7 | 96.1 | 100 | |
| 4 (FSU) |
|
|
R 1 |
R 2 |
R 3 |
R 4 |
|
R 1 |
1 2 |
2 3 |
1 4 |
| 99.4 | 98.3 | 95.4 | 96.6 | 97.1 | 96.9 | 98.7 | 99.4 | 96.8 | 94.6 | 95.4 | |
| 5 (NFSU-EUR) |
|
|
R 1 |
R 2 |
R 3 |
R 4 |
|
R 1 |
1 2 |
2 3 |
1 4 |
| 100 | 95.6 | 95.6 | 94.5 | 92.8 | 92.5 | 100 | 100 | 95.4 | 95.5 | 93.9 | |
| 6 (SEAR) |
|
|
|
R 1 |
R 1 |
R 2 |
1 2 |
R 3 |
2 3 |
R 4 |
|
| 100 | 98 | 95.5 | 99.5 | 96.7 | 97.5 | 100 | 100 | 99.7 | 99.5 | 99.7 | |
|
|
|
R 1 |
R 1 |
R 2 |
1 2 |
R 3 |
2 3 |
R 4 |
||
| 100 | 100 | 99.7 | 100 | 99.5 | |||||||
| 7 (WPR) |
|
|
R 1 |
R 2 |
R 3 |
R 4 |
|
R 1 |
1 2 |
2 3 |
1 4 |
| 96.8 | 96.9 | 94.5 | 96.5 | 96.3 | 95.9 | 94.4 | 98.4 | 97.5 | 96.1 | 93.8 | |
Coverage is defined as the percentage of time the 95% credible intervals contain the true parameter, given the simulation resulted in the correct tree structure. R = root of the tree. Nodes = {1,2,3,4}. The region simulated is shown in parenthesis. The nodes {1,2,3,4} correspond to the drugs in the application: {H, R, E, S}. 
is the tree weight of the prespecified structures.