Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 21;7(3):e2142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002142

Table 3. Infection/exposure status changes based on sero-antigen and sero-antibody analysis throughout the study period.

Status per sampling round Test
Ag-ELISA EITB
R1 R2 R3 No. % No. %
N N N 680 78.4 72 44.7
N N P 26 3.0 16 9.9
N P P 21 2.4 9 5.6
N P N 31 3.6 9 5.6
P N N 32 3.7 13 8.1
P N P 4 0.5 6 3.7
P P N 16 1.8 5 3.1
P P P 57 6.6 31 19.3

R1, R2 and R3 stand for first, second and third rounds of sampling. N and P stand for negative and positive test result, respectively. Ag-ELISA: detection of circulating cysticercus antigen in serum. “No.” expresses the number of participants that presented the given statuses (e.g. N N N) during the follow up (e.g. 680 participants tested negative at all three sampling rounds, N N N); EITB: detection of specific antibodies in serum “No.” expresses the number of participants that presented the given statuses during the follow up (e.g. 72 participants of the 161 tested negative at all three sampling rounds, N N N. This number is independent of the Ag-ELISA result).