Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 6;11:33. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-33

Table 2.

Proportions and odds ratios of being in the worst category of pedsQL (the lowest quartile) for obese, overweight and underweight, after adjusting for significant covariates

Subscale Proportion in the Lowest Score Category, % Odds Ratios (95% CI)
Physical Functioning§
 
 
  Underweight
29.4
2.371 (1.046 – 5.374)
  Overweight
29.4
2.269 (0.996 – 5.166)
  Obese
28.2
5.308 (2.246 – 12.546)
Emotional Functioning#
 
 
  Underweight
26.7
0.679 (0.333 – 1.382)
  Overweight
25.3
0.646 (0.310 – 1.347)
  Obese
10.7
0.235 (0.074 – 0.743)
Social Functioning#
 
 
  Underweight
26.3
1.631 (0.759 – 3.505)
  Overweight
29.5
2.160 (1.017 – 4.584)
  Obese
24.2
2.450 (1.035 – 5.801)
School Functioning+
 
 
  Underweight
24.4
1.333 (0.617 – 2.879)
  Overweight
33.7
2.108 (0.996 – 4.459)
  Obese
24.4
2.863 (1.272 – 6.445)
Psychosocial Health Summary∥
   
  Underweight
23.8
1.241 (0.551 – 2.794)
  Overweight
30.0
1.989 (0.907 – 4.364)
  Obese 22.5 1.935 (0.772 – 4.849)

Note:

§Value adjusted for child age, number of childcare arrangements since birth, parents perceived as principal caregiver, mother’s education level and father’s education level.

#Value adjusted for number of stages of childcare arrangement since born, mother’s education level, father’s education level and father’s employment status.

+Value adjusted for child age, housing, mother’s education level, and father’s education level.

∥Value adjusted for mother’s birth place, mother’s length of stay in Hong Kong, mother’s education level, father’s education level and father’s employment status.