Table 2.
Numerical comparison of a pair of parameter combinations that represents the variation observed between the different algorithms
| Subst. | Gap Op. | Branch Len. | Algorithm | Min. | Median | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
0 |
0.05 |
Simulated |
1.088 |
1.218 |
1.337 |
| |
|
|
Fixed States |
1.275 |
1.534 |
1.755 |
| |
|
|
ADO |
1.044 |
1.148 |
1.215 |
| |
|
|
ADO + Iter. |
1.044 |
1.123 |
1.202 |
| 1 |
0 |
0.3 |
Simulated |
1.731 |
2.022 |
2.396 |
| |
|
|
Fixed States |
1.621 |
1.725 |
1.816 |
| |
|
|
ADO |
1.314 |
1.398 |
1.453 |
| |
|
|
ADO + Iter. |
1.300 |
1.377 |
1.393 |
| 4 |
3 |
0.05 |
Simulated |
1.108 |
1.262 |
1.415 |
| |
|
|
Fixed States |
1.302 |
1.557 |
1.766 |
| |
|
|
ADO |
1.084 |
1.208 |
1.312 |
| |
|
|
ADO + Iter. |
1.067 |
1.171 |
1.283 |
| 4 |
3 |
0.3 |
Simulated |
2.012 |
2.284 |
2.611 |
| |
|
|
Fixed States |
1.688 |
1.795 |
1.868 |
| |
|
|
ADO |
1.433 |
1.500 |
1.542 |
| ADO + Iter. | 1.388 | 1.442 | 1.453 |
Each individual indel has cost 1.