Table 2.
Relationship between objective measures of ProM and other personality factors.
| Reference | n | Participants | Personality measures | ProM task | Sub domain | Effect index1 | Personality factors2 | Pers. M/SD3 | Pers. rxx4 | ProM M/SD5 | ProM rxx6 | Notes7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LABORATORY/EVENT CUED | ||||||||||||
| Arana et al. (2008) | 157 | Students | 16PF-5 | Glasses | Vigilance | Hr/beta | Specific (1/5; +reasoning) | y | y | y | n | |
| Arana et al. (2008) | 157 | Students | 16PF-5 | Underline spec word | eProM | Hr/beta | Specific (1/5; +rule-consciousness) global (1/5; +self-control) | y | y | y | n | |
| Cuttler and Graf (2007) | 141 | 18–81 years old | NEO PI-R | Questionnaire Task | eProM | Cor | Perfectionism (1/3; +socially prescribed) | n | y | y | n | ag, c |
| Cuttler and Graf (2007) | 141 | 18–81 years old | NEO PI-R | Plug-in-the-Phone Task | eProM | Cor | Perfectionism (0/3) | n | y | y | n | ag |
| Rönnlund et al. (2011) | 255 | 60–94 years old | TCI | Reminding task | eProM | Hr/beta | Harm avoidance self-directedness | n | n | n | y | ag |
| Searleman (1996) | 80 | Students | JAS POI | Report favorite show | eProM | +Type A self-actualization | n | n | y | n | ||
| Searleman (1996) | 60 | Students | JAS | Remind phone call | eProM | Cor | +Type A | n | n | y | n | c |
| Kline Ai3 | Self-actualization | |||||||||||
| POI | Obsessive compulsive | |||||||||||
| Self-monitoring | Self-monitoring | |||||||||||
| LABORATORY/TIME CUED | ||||||||||||
| Arana et al. (2008) | 157 | Students | 16PF-5 | Sign every 5 min | eProM | Hr/beta | Global (0/5) | y | y | y | n | |
| NATURALISTIC/TIME CUED | ||||||||||||
| Cuttler and Graf (2007) | 141 | 18–81 years old | NEO PI-R | Confirmation-Call Task | eProM | Cor | Perfectionism (1/3; +socially prescribed) | n | y | y | n | ag |
| Searleman (1996) | 80 | Students | JAS | Leave a message | eProM | Type A | n | n | y | n | c | |
| POI | self-actualization | |||||||||||
| Searleman (1996) | 60 | Students | JAS | Date and time a card | eProM | Cor | Type A | n | n | y | n | |
| Kline Ai3 | Self-actualization | |||||||||||
| POI | Obsessive compulsive | |||||||||||
| Self-monitoring | Self-monitoring | |||||||||||
Note. O, Openness; C, Conscientiousness; E, Extroversion; A, Agreeableness; N, Neuroticism; 1cor, zero order correlation; hr/beta, hierarchical regression/beta values; loading, factor loading; 2The column lists personality factors investigated in each study condition beyond the Big Five. The “+” sign in front of the factor indicates the relationship between ProM and the specific personality factor was statistically significant and positive and the “−” sign indicates that the relationship was statistically significant and negative. The fractions such as 1/3 indicate that out of 3 personality factors examined only one was significantly related to ProM. 3Were Ms and SDs for personality measures reported? y, yes; n, no; 4Were reliabilities of personality measures reported? y, yes; n, no; 5Were Ms and SDs for ProM measures reported? y, yes; n, no; 6Were reliabilities of ProM measures reported? y, yes; n, no. 7ag, aggregate group; c, ceiling effects; 16PF-5 (Cattell et al., 1993); NEO FFI (Costa and McCrae, 1992); JAS (Krantz et al., 1974); POI (Jones and Crandall, 1986); Kline Ai3 (Kline, 1968).