Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jun 2;92(2):375–382. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29438

Table 3.

Circulating L ascorbic acid levels by levels of continuous and binary confounding factors in the British Women’s Heart and Health Study


Mean (95%CI) L-ascorbic acid

Confounder n Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3 p
SEP 2968 49.33
(47.71, 50.94)
42.72
(41.15, 44.29)
36.50
(34.26, 38.74)
2.8×10−20
Latitude (m) 3404 46.43
(44.82, 48.05)
39.08
(37.43, 40.74)
43.16
(41.58, 44.74)
0.006
Longitude (m) 3404 40.89
(39.32, 42.45)
44.23
(42.66, 45.80)
43.95
(42.20, 45.70)
0.007

Mean (95%CI) L-ascorbic acid

Confounder n No Yes p

<1hr vigorous
activity/wk
2972 43.56
(42.45, 44.67)
41.24
(38.93, .55)
0.08
< 2 drinks/day 3281 42.09
(41.04, 43.14)
49.49
(47.31, 51.67)
2.2×10−09
Parental
Cardiovascular
disease
3320 43.54
(42.19, 44.89)
43.89
(42.54, 45.25)
0.7
Hormone
replacement
therapy
3397 43.06
(41.98, 44.14)
45.94
(43.85, 48.04)
0.02
Current
smoker
3590 44.67
(43.71, 45.64)
32.47
(29.71, 35.22)
3.4e-16

Mean (95%CI) L ascorbic acid levels by continuous and binary confounding variables.

SEP denotes socioeconomic position score.

Tests of difference by confounder levels were derived from linear regression.