Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 1;3(3):569–580. doi: 10.1002/ece3.485

Table 2.

Models of spatial genetic structure and estimation of effective metapopulation size (meta-Ne) or the size of an idealized population with the same rate of inbreeding observed in the subdivided population under study

Name Model* Expectations Reference
Island Inline graphic meta-Ne > Inline graphic unless FST = 0; inequality increases with FST (divergence) Wright (1943)
Stepping stone (circular) Inline graphic meta-Ne > Inline graphic; inequality increases with decreasing average immigration rate (Inline graphic) Maruyama (1970)
Neighborhood (linear) Inline graphic meta-Ne > Inline graphic; inequality increases with increasing length of the habitat (L), but decreases with increasing population density (D) Wright (1946) Maruyama (1971)
Interdemic Inline graphic meta-Ne < Inline graphic; inequality increases with metapopulation inbreeding Nunney (1999)
Spatiotemporal Inline graphic meta-Ne > Inline graphic; inequality increases with the average number of migrants per generation Inline graphic Kobayashi and Yamamura (2007)
*

Metapopulation parameters: s = number of subpopulations/ponds; Inline graphic = average subpopulation Ne; FST = global genetic divergence among subpopulations; Inline graphic= average immigration rate; D = linear population density (individuals/km); L = length of habitat (km); σ2 = variance of dispersion distance; FIT = coefficient of global (metapopulation) inbreeding.