Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 8;25(5):775–784. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002256

Table 2.

Comparison between groups on HR, HF, and Faces Scale

hr rate of change hf rate of change faces scale value of
one-way anova one-way anova change mann-whitney
music session mean (sd) mean (sd) mean (sd)
Control group (n = 13) 0.02 (0.03)a −0.3 (0.2)d - −0.1 (0.2)g
Passive group (n = 13) −0.02 (0.02)b 0.7 (1.0)e 0.3 (0.4)h
Interactive group (n = 13) −0.03 (0.02)c 1.0 (0.7)f 1.1 (1.5)i

HR, Tukey's HSD (F(2,36) = 15.2, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

aControl group vs Passive group, **p < 0.01.

bControl group vs Interactive group, **p < 0.01.

cPassive group vs Interactive group, p = 0.66.

HF, Tukey's HSD (F(2,36) = 11.5,*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

dControl group vs Passive group, **p < 0.003.

eControl group vs Interactive group, **p < 0.00.

fPassive group vs Interactive group, p = 0.56.

Faces Scale; (*p < 0.0167).

gControl group vs Passive group, U = 33, *p < 0.007.

hControl group vs Interactive group, U = 0, *p < 0.00.

iPassive group vs Interactive group, U = 16, *p < 0.00.