. 2013 Mar 1;111(4):713–721. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct029

Table 1.

Size and shape of the middle leaflet of arctic bramble cultivars, indicating length-to-width ratio to be a good identification parameter

Cultivar	Length (mm)					Width (mm)					Length-to-width ratio
	Farm 1		Farm 2		Farm 3	Farm 1		Farm 2		Farm 3	Farm 1		Farm 2		Farm 3
	2008	2009	2008	2009	2008	2008	2009	2008	2009	2008	2008	2009	2008	2009	2008
‘Alli’	52^a	50^a	52^a	53^a	45^a	39^a	36^a	38^a	39^a	34^a	1·35^a	1·37^a	1·38^ab	1·38^a	1·32^a
‘Mesma’	48^ab	47^ab	47^ab	50^a	42^ab	27^bc	27^b	25^bc	29^b	23^b	1·84^b	1·77^b	1·89^c	1·78^b	1·84^b
‘Muuruska’	44^bc		43		39^ab	24^b		23		21^b	1·86^b		1·89		1·85^b
‘Pima’	45		46^ab		39	32.		34^a		29	1·41		1·34^a		1·35
‘Mespi’	46^bc	40	44^b	43	38	34^e	27	35^a	32	22	1·37^a	1·51	1·26^a	1·34	1·78
‘Elpee’	42^c		44^b		39^ab	29^cd		29^c		25^bc	1·48^a		1·51^b		1·58^c

The results are displayed from three different farms from one or two years. Observations were made from three leaves of each of the eight replicate plants; when one or more of the replicates had died they were excluded from the statistical analyses and are only displayed as an average. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at P < 0·05 (Tukey's test).