Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 14;69(Pt 4):625–634. doi: 10.1107/S0907444913000462

Table 2. Comparison of U cryst corresponding to the minima of the functions LS (3), LSL (11) and R factor (46) .

To improve readability, the U cryst are shown as B values with respect to a Cartesian basis (Grosse-Kunstleve & Adams, 2002). To reduce the runtimes for the systematic parameter searches (see text), we have selected examples with symmetry constraints leading to all-zero off-diagonal elements.

PDB code Optimization target B 11, B 22, B 33 R factor
2fih R factor −2.15, −1.85, −1.60 0.1935
LS −4.20, −3.90, −3.35 0.2179
Inline graphic −2.65, −1.95, −1.60 0.1939
2fih (data cut at 2.5 Å) R factor −9.30, −10.20, −10.35 0.2417
LS −18.35, −19.65, −20.75 0.2599
Inline graphic −38.25, −42.15, −46.20 0.3769
1ous (data cut at 6.5 Å) R factor 9.25, −2.20, 4.35 0.2082
LS 2.90, −2.45, 8.60 0.2086
Inline graphic 19.55, 6.55, 12.85 0.2088