Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 18;13:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-87

Table 4.

Prevalence of MES (with relative risk) and indicators of cardiovascular risk (split according to gender)

  Male n = 62, (%) Female n = 77, (%) Total n, (%) χ2, P-value*
Metabolic Syndrome present
19 (31)
30 (39)
49 (35)
NS
Relative Risk of Metabolic Syndrome (95% CI, P value)**
1.737 (1.18-2.54, p < 0.01)
2.230 (1.67-2.97, p < 0.01)
2.008 (1.59-2.53, p < 0.01)
BMI overweight- Hong Kong criterion (≥23)
48 (77)
63 (82)
111 (80)
NS
BMI overweight- International criterion (≥25)
34 (55)
45 (58)
79 (57)
NS
Waist Circumference (males ≥90 cm, females ≥ 80 cm)
20 (32)
47 (61)
67 (48)
χ2 = 11.40, p < 0.01
Hypertension – Blood pressure ≥ 140/90
12 (19)
21 (27)
33 (24)
NS
Hypercholesterolemia – Total Cholesterol ≥6.2 mmol/L
15 (24)
16 (21)
31 (22)
NS
Raised LDL cholesterol – LDL ≥ 4.1 mmol/L
11 (18)
12 (16)
23 (16)
NS
Reduced HDL cholesterol – HDL <1.00 mmol/L (males), <1.30 mmol/L (females)
13 (21)
19 (25)
32 (23)
NS
Raised fasting plasma glucose - ≥ 7.00 mmol/L
8 (13)
9 (12)
17 (12)
NS
Raised triglycerides - ≥2.2 mmol/L 17 (27) 17 (22) 34 (25) NS

*P for significant differences in cardiovascular risk according to gender, tested by χ2 test.

NS = not statistically significant.

** Data reported by Ko and Tang [6] for the prevalence of MES in the general Hong Kong population was used to calculate the relative risk in this sample.