Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 22;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-46

Table 7.

Relative effects of adding different IRS treatments in huts with different LLIN types

 
Adding IRS with pirimiphos methyl
Adding IRS with lambda cyhalothrin
Adding IRS with DDT
    RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value
Huts with Untreated nets
Dry season
2.200 (1.734 – 2.792)
< 0.001
1.920 (1.582 – 2.330)
< 0.001
1.730 (1.398 – 2.140)
< 0.001
 
Wet season
2.208 (1.821 – 2.677)
< 0.001
1.551 (1.274 – 1.887)
< 0.001
1.444 (1.181 – 1.766)
< 0.001
Huts with Olyset® nets
Dry season
2.218 (1.194 – 4.118)
= 0.012
1.717 (0.965 – 3.055)
= 0.538
0.940 (0.510 – 1.732)
= 0.843
 
Wet season
1.375 (1.143 – 1.654)
= 0.001
1.075 (0.889 – 1.301)
= 0.455
1.174 (0.968 – 1.425)
= 0.103
Huts with PermaNet 2.0® nets
Dry season
2.264 (1.218 – 4.207)
= 0.010
1.313 (0.734 – 2.349)
= 0.359
0.920 (0.524 – 1.797)
= 0.924
 
Wet season
1.420 (1.179 – 1.710)
< 0.001
1.173 (0.969 – 1.419)
= 0.103
1.031 (0.849 – 1.253)
= 0.756
Huts with Icon Life® nets
Dry season
1.401 (1.169 – 1.680)
< 0.001
1.093 (0.922 – 1.295)
= 0.306
0.767 (0.636 – 0.925)
= 0.006
  Wet season 1.237 (1.029 – 1.486) = 0.023 1.008 (0.835 – 1.217) = 0.972 0.995 (0.821 – 1.205) = 0.958

The table shows relative rates (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals of increased mortality of Anopheles arabiensis in huts with LLINs plus IRS, compared to huts with nets alone.