. 2013 Mar 22;8(3):e58724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058724

Table 1. Numerical results from the SPR analysis of HIV-BAL env binding.

Sample	Activity	k _ass	k _diss	K _D	R_max	Chi²
	%	[10⁵•M⁻¹s⁻¹]	[10⁻⁴. s⁻¹]	[nM]	[RU]
^CHO2G12 ¹	108	1.2	1.03	0.86	74.7	1.42
^CHO2G12	= 100	1.18	1.31	1.11	67.9	0.394
^p19/Nb2G12_KDEL day 6	101	0.983	1.44	1.46	68.8	0.365
^p19/Nb2G12_KDEL day 12	102	0.931	1.82	1.95	69.2	0.354
^p19/Nb2G12_KDEL day 16	94	0.922	1.90	2.06	63.5	0.308
^HEKVRC01	= 100	0.719	0.581	0.807	78.1	0.025
^SR1−NtVRC01_KDEL day 4	83	0.740	0.551	0.745	65.0	0.009
^p19/NbVRC01_KDEL day 6	83	0.699	0.884	1.27	65.2	0.008
^p19/NbVRC01_KDEL day 12	77	0.811	1.00	1.23	60.1	0.020
^p19/NbVRC01_KDEL day 16	80	0.698	0.959	1.37	62.70	0.012
^SR1−NtVRC01 day 4	75	0.618	0.715	1.16	58.60	0.022
^p19/NbVRC01 day 6	78	0.668	0.970	1.45	60.70	0.011
^p19/NbVRC01 day12	75	0.673	1.03	1.52	58.60	0.015
^CHOb12	= 100	N/A ²
^SR1−Ntb12_KDEL day 4	92
^p19/Nbb12_KDEL day 11	92
^p19/Nbb12_KDEL day 14	89
^p19/Nbb12 day 6	103
^p19/Nbb12 day 11	98
^p19/Nbb12 day 14	78

As reported [38], the comparison to these measurements shows an excellent reproducibility, with marginal differences being within experimental limits.

N/A. = not applicable.