Table 4.
Regression models identifying factors that predict neonatal mortality among institutional and home births disaggregated by urban and rural samples with wealth quintiles as explanatory variableb
|
Odds ratios for neonatal mortality for institutional deliveries | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Variable |
Model 1: Rural only |
Model 2: Urban only |
|||||||
| OR | P | Confidence intervals | OR | P | Confidence intervals | ||||
|
Year of survey (reference 2007) | |||||||||
|
2004 |
1.41 |
0.41 |
0.62 |
3.21 |
1.12 |
0.78 |
0.52 |
2.40 |
|
|
2000 |
1.51 |
0.34 |
0.65 |
3.47 |
0.78 |
0.58 |
0.33 |
1.88 |
|
|
1996 |
2.70* |
0.02 |
1.15 |
6.32 |
1.95 |
0.16 |
0.76 |
4.97 |
|
|
Wealth quintile (reference richest quintile 5) | |||||||||
|
Quintiles 1-4 |
2.25** |
0.01 |
1.18 |
4.28 |
1.70 |
0.17 |
0.79 |
3.65 |
|
| |
Sample size: 1046 |
|
|
|
Sample size: 1733 |
|
|
|
|
|
Odds ratios for neonatal mortality for home deliveries | |||||||||
| |
Model 3: Rural |
Model 4: Urban |
|||||||
|
Variable |
OR |
P |
Confidence intervals |
|
OR |
P |
Confidence intervals |
|
|
|
Year of survey (reference 2007) |
|||||||||
|
2004 |
0.93 |
0.59 |
0.70 |
1.22 |
1.25 |
0.37 |
0.76 |
2.06 |
|
|
2000 |
0.88 |
0.36 |
0.67 |
1.16 |
1.57 |
0.07 |
0.97 |
2.55 |
|
|
1996 |
1.61** |
0.00 |
1.22 |
2.11 |
2.46** |
0.00 |
1.36 |
4.45 |
|
|
Wealth quintile (reference richest quintile 5) |
|||||||||
|
Quintiles 1-4 |
1.14 |
0.29 |
0.90 |
1.45 |
1.26 |
0.49 |
0.65 |
2.44 |
|
| Sample size: 18206 | Sample size: 4943 | ||||||||
* OR significant at 5% ** OR significant at 1%.
b Models also adjusted for sex, multiple birth, birth order and parity and antenatal care.