Table 3.
Comparison between rPGM-ELISA and IHA in terms of sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of ALA using statistical analysis
|
Sensitivity |
IHA |
Total |
Fisher’s Exact Test (p-value) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .00 | 1.00 | ||||
| rPGM-ELISA |
.00 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0.620 |
| |
1.00 |
2 |
17 |
19 |
|
| Total |
2 |
22 |
24 |
|
|
|
Specificity |
IHA |
Total |
Fisher’s Exact Test (p-value) |
||
| |
|
.00 |
1.00 |
|
|
| rPGM-ELISA |
.00 |
181 |
14 |
195 |
0.638 |
| |
1.00 |
28 |
2 |
30 |
|
| Total | 209 | 16 | 225 | ||
Note: (.00): Negative; (1.00): Positive.